Digital PR and link building at ScaleGrowth Digital are built around earned editorial placement, original data stories, and the citation surface that LLMs read against. The team writes the data study, pitches the story to verticals where it actually fits, and only then chases the link. Bulk link buys, PBN networks and paid guest posts do not appear in the engagement. Most retainers run six to twelve months because earned editorial pacing makes shorter windows commercially dishonest.
Two changes have re-shaped digital PR over the past eighteen months. First, Google’s spam systems have flattened the value of the off-domain link to near zero where the link is undisclosed-paid, AI-spun or stitched out of a network. The remaining value sits with editorial placement on outlets the LLMs and Google Discover already trust. Second, the rise of AI Overview, AI Mode, ChatGPT search and Perplexity has moved a measurable share of brand-discovery onto citation-style answers. The brand that gets cited in an AI Overview answer about home loans, halal stock screening or coworking pricing wins traffic without ranking first.
The implication for the work is that the deliverable has changed. The deliverable used to be ten do-follow links per month. The deliverable now is two or three earned placements per month on outlets the target audience reads, plus measurable lift in AI-citation rate across a tracked prompt set. On a 25,000-page NBFC site, the baseline citation rate was 8 percent on ChatGPT, 15.6 percent on Google AI Overview and 19 percent on Google AI Mode. The PR program reports against those numbers, not against a domain-authority delta from a third-party crawler.
Five tracks operate in parallel.
Track A: data story production. The team identifies one defensible data study per quarter from the brand’s first-party data, anonymised correctly. Past stories include a 794-brief content engine outcome, a 4,431-broken-link audit on a 25K-page NBFC, a 2,081-issue contamination audit on a steel exporter, and a one-URL-95-variant gold-loan engine across six Indian languages. Each story is sized for editorial reuse: a press-ready summary, a methodology note, a chart pack, and a quote-ready paragraph.
Track B: outlet mapping. The team maps the editorial outlets the brand’s target audience actually reads, classified by audience overlap, traffic, AI-citation frequency and editorial standards. A BFSI brand gets a different outlet map (Mint, Economic Times Markets, BloombergQuint, Moneycontrol, Inc42) from an industrial-materials manufacturer (Architecture and Design, ArchDaily, trade publications). The map carries named journalists, beats covered, and recent stories they have written.
Track C: pitching. Personalised pitches go out per journalist per outlet, referencing recent stories, naming the angle the data study supports, and offering an exclusive window where the angle warrants it. Pitches are tracked in a CRM column on the same lead dashboard the brand already runs. Response rates, placement rates and time-to-placement get reported monthly.
Track D: digital-first formats. For audiences that read newsletters, podcasts and trade-Substack rather than legacy outlets, the team produces a parallel format pack (newsletter Q&A pitch, podcast brief, expert-contribution template).
Track E: AI-citation engineering. Placements are tracked into the AI-citation testbed. A prompt set of fifty to three hundred queries is run monthly across ChatGPT, AI Overview, AI Mode and Perplexity. Brand mention rate and citation source rate are tracked over time. The same testbed feeds the AI visibility service.
The program sits alongside content production (which feeds the data stories) and the team that ships it.
For a major BFSI lender, the audit findings (4,431 broken internal links, 78 percent hreflang error rate on 4,330 links, 3,620 sitemap waste URLs, 71 percent of crawled pages returning 403 from a WAF misconfiguration) became a data story pitched into trade and tech-business outlets. The same audit produced a quote-ready paragraph used across editorial placement and the brand’s own PR cycle. The 794-brief content engine outcome, batched as four releases over five weeks with the final two batches at 100 percent Pydantic pass, became a second data story.
For a coworking marketplace in the Mumbai metro, the data study was the 21-axis URL map. The category leader had 2,194 declared URLs in its sitemap and about 9,448 ranking URLs across India but ranked at under one percent on need-state, cohort and price-band axes inside Mumbai metro. The story was the gap. The placement angle was “the marketplace category is missing the three signals buyers actually search on.” The same data study fed an editorial overlay on the brand’s own programmatic pages.
For a healthcare specialty chain, the data study inverted the brief. The original brief assumed invisibility versus Apollo, Kauvery, MIOT and Rela in Chennai. Manual verification of thirty priority kidney and urology queries found eleven top-three ranks, twenty-five top-ten ranks and fourteen local-pack appearances, more than any other brand. The story was that a smaller specialty chain was outranking competitors four to thirty-three times larger by domain. That story drives both PR placement and the brand’s own content cadence.
Month one is data-story production plus outlet mapping. Month two onwards is the running cadence: two to three pitches per week, one earned placement per fortnight target, one chart-pack release per quarter, monthly AI-citation report. The team is one digital PR lead, one data analyst, one editorial lead and one outreach operator. The brand provides one spokesperson available for media interviews on twenty-four to forty-eight hour notice.
The pilot (six weeks, one data study, outlet map, first pitch wave) is priced at ten thousand US dollars internationally and seven lakh rupees in India. The standard monthly retainer is priced at four thousand to nine thousand US dollars per month internationally and three to six lakh rupees per month in India. Outlet syndication budget and journalist exclusive briefings, where applicable, are scoped separately.
| Track | Cadence | Primary metric |
|---|---|---|
| Data story production | One per quarter | Press-ready chart pack and quote paragraph |
| Outlet mapping | Refreshed quarterly | Audience overlap, AI-citation frequency |
| Pitching | Two to three per week | Placement rate, time to placement |
| Digital-first formats | Monthly | Newsletter, podcast and Substack placements |
| AI-citation engineering | Monthly prompt run | Brand-mention and citation-source rate |
How many links per month? Volume is not the metric. The target is two to three earned placements per month on outlets that match the audience map, plus measurable lift on AI citation rate. A program that ships ten low-quality directory listings is worse than a program that ships two editorial placements on Mint or Inc42.
How long until results show up? First earned placement typically lands in month two. AI citation rate moves with a lag of three to five months because indexing and re-ranking by the LLMs is not instant. Programs under six months consistently under-deliver because the cadence has not had time to compound.
Do you do paid guest posts or PBNs? No. Both are explicitly out of scope. The work is earned editorial only.
How do you track AI citation rate? A locked prompt set of fifty to three hundred queries is run monthly across ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, Google AI Mode and Perplexity. Brand mention rate, citation source rate and answer-frame share are tracked over time and reported in the monthly review.
Do you write the data story or do we? The team writes it. The brand supplies the data (first-party engagement metrics, audit findings, customer outcomes) and one spokesperson available for press interviews. Anonymisation and editorial framing are owned by the PR team.
A two-week diagnostic identifies the one defensible data story sitting inside your first-party data and maps the outlets it should pitch into. Output is a one-page story brief plus a named outlet list.
{
“@context”: “https://schema.org”,
“@graph”: [
{
“@type”: “Service”,
“@id”: “https://scalegrowth.digital/services/digital-pr/#service”,
“name”: “Digital PR And Link Building”,
“serviceType”: “Earned editorial placement, original data study production and AI citation engineering”,
“provider”: {“@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “ScaleGrowth Digital”, “url”: “https://scalegrowth.digital/”},
“areaServed”: “Worldwide”,
“offers”: [
{“@type”: “Offer”, “name”: “Six-week pilot (one data study and first pitch wave)”, “price”: “10000”, “priceCurrency”: “USD”},
{“@type”: “Offer”, “name”: “Monthly retainer”, “priceSpecification”: {“@type”: “UnitPriceSpecification”, “minPrice”: “4000”, “maxPrice”: “9000”, “priceCurrency”: “USD”, “unitText”: “MON”}}
]
},
{
“@type”: “FAQPage”,
“@id”: “https://scalegrowth.digital/services/digital-pr/#faq”,
“mainEntity”: [
{“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “How many links per month do you deliver?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “Volume is not the metric. The target is two to three earned placements per month on outlets matching the audience map, plus measurable lift on AI citation rate. Ten low-quality directories are worse than two strong editorial placements.”}},
{“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “How long until results show up?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “First earned placement typically lands in month two. AI citation rate moves with a three-to-five month lag because LLM indexing and re-ranking is not instant. Programs under six months consistently under-deliver.”}},
{“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Do you do paid guest posts or PBNs?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “No. Both are out of scope. The work is earned editorial placement only.”}},
{“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “How do you track AI citation rate?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “A locked prompt set of fifty to three hundred queries runs monthly across ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, Google AI Mode and Perplexity. Brand mention rate, citation source rate and answer-frame share are tracked over time.”}},
{“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Do you write the data story or do we?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “The team writes it. The brand supplies data and one spokesperson available for press. Anonymisation and editorial framing are owned by the PR team.”}}
]
}
]
}
AI Visibility How to Rank AI Content in Google Search: What Works vs What Doesn’t…
Read more →Terms of Service and Disclosure Requirements for AI Content Major platforms have catalogued explicit positions…
Read more →Auditing Author Credibility: The 2026 Rubric Author credibility used to be a polite footnote. In…
Read more →The Seven Deadly Sins of Mass AI Content Mass-produced AI content fails in seven predictable…
Read more →